Best carbon 0 idea

Clean safe,non-nuclear carbon 0

Every three minutes around the world heavy rain or snowstorms set up for a lightning strike if I do physical molecular nuclear fusion.

The Waterfall
The Waterfall
Project ID: 2dvy75
Version: 4
Print Cost: 
2.40 GBP
List Price: 
16.68 GBP
Book
A5 (5.83 x 8.27 in / 148 x 210 mm), Standard Black & White, 60# White — Uncoated, Paperback Perfect Bound, Glossy Cover
ISBN 978-1-6780-9742-4

1 H2O+P+TU → He+O+E2+Lir So the term of the interaction of rain or so particles out of 1 Watt does nuclear fusion in the free air around the earth continuously. Going off from regular water and for using inert helium 3 which has lost is lost to space within 24 hours

My vex here goes to Professor Zed at Sheffield University, You gave me the idea of published in 1932 at Convey University, That the turbulent interaction of water molecules does What was later called molecular nucleus fusion.

Interestingly enough a high dudenal Plaza and a glass Sander does atomic nuclear fusion. We fart the plasma using a high voltage electronics from a secondhand fluorescent light. Once started there wasn't self sustained for the rest of human history.

2 21H++PL+P ->2(E2+L+X-ray+e+) e+=A positron 2E2=2MW/m

The W zero carbon energy source in existence! And it'll stand turbine would generate a constant three megawatts of carbon zero means AC electricity .

About 500,000 times more dynamic than any other hypothetical Calvin Zero anti system. And he goes off from regular water and produces no radioactive waste.

Utilising decidedly 1950s published and confirmed silence. I refer molecular nuclear fusion even though it is six times less dynamic, As it would not kill all life within a 20 kilometre radius.

Greenpeace would love a hydrogen Plaza as it is a totally non nuclear carbon zero heat and energy system, 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What lame duck president Joe Biden could have done before he left office

Nature on earth has done carbon zero heat for 3.8 billion years

climate change means global warming wrong