Nuclear Fusion on Earth

The Senate rocks I have in publishing about a plasma burn in carbon zero heat for seven years.  It uses the cellar aily high school physics.  Which is why the climate change pundits have not even commented! Professor Z said I should resume my PH D work I left in 2001, within physics.  My thanks to all the physics lecturers who are published work on a plasma burn.  Oath he was so embarrassed, he was a total answer to carbon zero non nuclear power. We are first in out that a steam plasma user years e.g. high voltage electronics, to strike the water molecules into positive atomic nuclei with potentially some shell electrons, and three electrons. 1 H₂O+de/dT→2H⁺+O⁺+3e⁻ A steam plasma! We are positive hydrogen ions, in chaotic flow with the negatively charged electrons.  No longer locked into safe atomic orbits!  And here physics gets very excited!  It is basically the sub atomic particles in a chaotic mist. My American friend validated that w...

Nuclear = death After Chernobyl in 1986, nuclear power paid its academic contacts to invent a reason for nuclear power to still exist.  Chernobyl her cause a localised nuclear winter in the Ukraine. The academics knew that modern photosynthesis limits free carbon dioxide in the temperate earth, to just two parts per million today.  It was 4 PPM in the Jurassic.  A generally warm period.  Hence the genesis of man made global warming - controlled exclusively by carbon dioxide level in the free air. This was an interesting piece of scientific science fiction.  They forgot to factor Ian the carbon dioxide production on building a nuclear power plant.  All that cement for the reinforced concrete, is produced via a fossil fuel burn on limestone. Making an active nuclear power plant building programme, Mahler's fourth largest source of carbon emissions!  The academic stooges were physicists!  Who were all sorts of all biology in high school. Th...

the sun makes the climate.  Man lives with it Thank God.  As the building of a nuclear power plant creates a massive spike of local of carbon dioxide emissions.  He just two years of plant construction, the nuclear plant releases the carbon equivalent for 25 years from a conventional power plant. Think it this way!  In carbon dioxide didn't affect the climate frustrating a uranium nuclear power plant which raised local temperatures by 50° C.  You would think that somebody would have noticed! The area are in a nuclear plant in Scotland, we have the climate is Saudi Arabia for two years! The nuclear plants were built in the days of a nationalised nuclear industry.  Even Sizewell B.  Which is very important.  As all nuclear plants there are privatize have to carry the and and insurance. After Chernobyl in 1986, the required annual insurance was 40 billion.  There is no insurance available above one billion!  Since Fukushima in 201...

Not  nuclear power = most toxic Every 3 seconds around the world heavy rain or snow storms do nuclear fusion.  What we term molecular nuclear fusion.  Answer hydrogen is from ions in hydrogen compounds. 1 H₂O+P+TU→He²⁺+O⁺+e⁻+E+X-ray which is why he all storms give out heat and X rays. We build up A potential and that in the cloud tops, where the positive charge collects, and the ground where the negatively charged electrons fall. At 5000 volts 100 amps we get a lightening down strike.  That produces five terms of helium ions.  The oxygen atoms bond with molecular oxygen, to form ozone.  Which we have all smells from heavy rain or snow. The lightening strike strips water molecules into positive ions and free electrons. 2 H₂O+PL→2H⁺+O⁺+3e⁻+L+X-ray Within the lightening bolt we are forming helium, but also are the hydrogen ions and free electrons bond to form neutrons.  A non nuclear neutron source. 3 H⁺+e⁻→n⁰ So there is no chemical s...