Nuclear Fusion on Earth

2018 My American Contact that a 30x1.5cm steam fuzzman gave off a constant one megawatt of heat. they're actually built on the ideas Dr Z The Ovalidated by Columbia University in the 1930s, that the turbulent I was academically fusion. 1 H 2 O+TU → He+O+E+X-ray TU= two of them is greater than 1 W in a confined class cylinder air flowers when I converts the water molecules into a chaotic mist of positive atonuclei and free electrons. 2 H 2 O+PL → 2H + +O + +3e - the hydrocarbon industry it's so embedded in our society and education system that their elder foot a stop to any research in the clean non toxic nuclear fusion. you're in a nuclear fire vote the doctor each chair in chemical and process engineering. and he lost all interest in nuclear fusion! his vig research area. so the father is a chaotic mist of sub atomic particles. where the electrons are now free to the incident on a hydrogen nucleus. everyone wanted to one or more neutrons. usually just one!...

when you fire an oil or gas flame it turns on the carbohydrate into carbon dioxide. giving off heat light and even as I learned in the 1980s X rays. there is no non nuclear source of X rays! but as her father of the PhD student told me at Sheffield University 2000 fossil Fuel burn releases light, heat and X rays as it fires up a steam plasma . 1 C m H n +(m+n/2)O 2 +flame+P+TU → mCO 2 +(n-r)H 2 O+r(E 2 +L+X-ray) TU=turbulence I have to understand this equation! as I was working within chemical engineering. the upshot is the turbulent flow of steam Father of a steam plasma which converts the water molecules into heat light and X rays. the X rays a little far and of no consequence! as produced by beating an old heart like yours, you can take your thoughts with a fast Geiger counter! 2 H 2 O+TU → 2(E 2 +L+X-ray) so now we are cooking on gas! what I needed also somebody to use a high voltage electronics from inforescent light to firing up a steam plasma. once established ...

Carbon 0 from water pays this was established in Sheffield university 2000. but academics get very unhappy We discuss carbon zero energy systems. as global warming was the major external sounds founder of our education from 1986 you're a chernobyl. nothing is it will make climate change as a natural earth climb started cooling on a predictor or 28 year cycle of heating and cooling. 'cause my predictablr solar emission changes. in 2000 I the Princeton University work that 8000 As long as a carbon zero heat source! 2018 My American friend confirmed that a 30x1.5cn non pressure I steam Whether you say constant one megawatt of heat. the plasma fighter by using a force .of AC high voltage current. like chrome A fluorescent light starter. it all works so well The floods were fragile will not need to be augmented for 1000 years. in contrast I want me to row or gather all Venus only is it 45kW of heat. the evacuate to turn one megawatt over into Covent names AC Electricity i...

Carbon 0 pays this idea actually journeys massive excess electricity. generating an annual cheque from the fire companies for 90,000 UK funds a year! involving no nuclear materials are fossil fuel. so clean and safe and massive economically attractive heat and power. this idea was actually practically confirmed for my contact 2018. so the academic world is not interested! 'cause I make so much money for a nuclear fire to write sounds fiction about carbon dioxide. since photosynthesis evolved in the cretaceous all Fland and annual life has been defend on a photosynthesis going on unlanded in the seas. it fixes carbon dioxide into the carbohydrates of plant biomass. 1 mCO 2 +(n+r)+L+chlorophyll → (C m (H 2 O) n +mO 2 -E)+r(He 2+ +O + +4e - +E 2 +X-ray) so green plants and light happily form plantbiomass, excrete the unwanted oxygen and helium gases and give off X rays . amazing I was taught in the 1980s a photosynth please the creation of ions and Releases X rays. The...

Water -> electricity an anatomic nuclei you have protons and neutrons .the neutrons stabilising the nuclei. physics teaches at a neutron Is a fruiton funded to an electron/ the protons and electrons strongly attract. and there's also a Mass boson in photons and neutrons the protons and neutrons are thus attracted to other self atomic elements with mass. physics gets very excited about gas plasma, it's so a type of articles and free electrons. 1 H 2 O+PL → 2H + +O + +3e and yes oxygen will carry a positive charge though it is desperate to lose it! the simplest way far up and farther SU zeig Experts are high voltage electricity from their fluorescent light starter. 10,000 Vol 0.001 amps/ so when we fire up a steam plasma we have the water nucleus and free electrons moving around in a random fashion. 2 H + =p + .n 0 so a hydrogen is a fruit and von de tears is just one neutron . H3 - tritium undergoes nuclear fission almost instantly. 3 1 H + +2n 0 → 3 H+...

2018 my american friend validated that a 30x1.5cm steam plasma generated a constant one rigorous of carbon zero heat. 1 H 2 O+PL → 2(E 2 +L+(X-ray)) hopefully a non pressurised team flows will the rate no X ray radiation. we just get that Carbon 0 heat. we do not utilise solar panels! which are hard for expensive 1980s idea. we utilise science published in the 1930s. the thermoelectric generator. which today converts heat into AC electricity There were 13% efficiency. so a one megabyte of generates 130 kilowatts of AC electricity. please start of the first if the daughter electricity from a car of our battery, a single a 12 Volt battery power set up a mains voltage 130 kilowatts energy production system. that is the electrical fire for between 16 and 80 houses1 all of which is totally obvious to every physics lecturer or professor on the planet. who are away talking sounds rubbish about carbon dioxide! in exchange for research funding from nuclear power. fielding a...