Turbulent steam does nuclear fusion

Like loves CO2

The idea of Dr. Z 2001.  Actually devise by his uncle at Columbia University.  And familiar to every academic on the planet.

Before we have a lightning strike, we have a heavy rain or snow storm.  Which geography has noted gives out X ray radiation, heat and they used to the creation of helium ions.  Of issues no chemical source!

The turbulence of the precipitation does physical molecular nuclear fusion: when TU, the turnover interaction of precipitation molecules is greater than 1 Whatt.

1 H₂O+TU→He²⁺+O⁺+3e⁻+E+X-ray

When we get a potential builder of 5000 volts, a partial steam plasma links up the cloud tops the ground with a 1.5x2cm a partial steam plasma.  And he locally geography departments have done the experimental measurements for me.

The air the creation of 5 tonnes of helium ions as a lightening bolt touches down.  Formed by the fusing of hydrogen molecules to form a helium.

My American friend had do the experiments for me.  A 30x1.5cm steam plasma, fired up user high voltage electronics from old fluorescent light starter, will release a constant 1 MW of carbon zero heat.

Am also start the plasma will self sustain while we had just 10⁻̾⁶cc of regular water a year.  An once set up the plasma will then self sustain with no more external current.

The cheapest way to turn are 1 MW of heat into three phase AC electricity, is to use a commercially sourced 65 kW thermoelectric generator.

And really really upset!  The climate change people are still on about carbon dioxide.  Yet here I have shown them are massively energetic, non nuclear heat and power generation system.

Any house is only 8 kW of electrical power on Christmas day.  This sell the rest the current to national grid is annual third of 140 thousand UK pounds every year.

For that lovely carbon zero, non nuclear AC current.  Involving no fossil fuel burn.  The plasma converting regular light water, into massive heat the motor light and maybe lower power X ray radiation.

So massive income for all that non nuclear carbon zero electricity.  Why then are the climate change pundits on about carbon dioxide?  He was uranium nuclear power will pay them no money to talk sun's rubbish about carbon dioxide.

Around the temperate land and sea photosynthesis today limits free carbon dioxide in the afternoon air to just two parts per million.  No 400 PPM.  Photosynthesis converts additional carbon dioxide during the day he into plant biomass within 5 minutes.

Sucking air to the air!  So no possible climatic effect.  Burning the fossil fuels just releases the organic carbon back into the environment.  Increasing plant and animal your arms around the earth.

At the same time uranium nuclear power must remember there constructing a uranium nuclear power plant, using a massive fossil fuel burn on limestone to free use all the cement.

Making an active nuclear power building programme mankind's fourth largest source of carbon dioxide.  Releasing in just two years the Covent carbon emissions from a commercially fired power plant over 25 years.

But if we run a 30 cm steam plasma, we get out a constant 1 MW of carbon zero heat.  Burning oil or gas only releases 45 kW of heat, as he releases massive of life enhancing carbon dioxide.

So there is no possible weather effect of carbon dioxide.  I was paid science fiction on behalf of hyper toxic uranium nuclear power, after the Chernobyl nuclear disaster of 1986.

When the annual insurance cover required for 100 MW nuclear power plant was raised to 40 billion.  From the criminally insufficient 50 million, carried by nuclear plant's since before the win skill disaster of 1976.

2010 and sore Tokyo nuclear experience the Fukushima incident.  The required insurance was released to 100 billion.  There being no available insurance above one billion, all surviving 422 nuclear plants running with criminally insufficient insurance.

Are little 30 cm steam plasma will release a constant 1 MW of heat.  A small steam turbine will convert into ½ MW of three phase mains linked AC current.  Giving us a monthly income of 15,000 UK pounds, from a plant costing just 2000 UK pounds to build.  Then running on for over!

To sall job to of a high voltage electricity to fire up the plasma.  Then 10⁻ⁱ⁶cc of regular water a year to maintain the plasma.  So he cancer ½ MW of carbon zero, non nuclear power.

And the national grid will pay us 3000 UK pounds annually for just 1 kW of electrical power.  So we get an income of 145 million UK pounds a year.  For all that lovely carbon zero electricity.

If we are back into the Jurassic age 65 million years ago, photosynthesis was less efficient and left four PPM carbon dioxide in the temperate air.

That the Jurassic and three natural ice ages!  And carbon dioxide rose to eight PPM.  One the ice ages lasting a record breaking 1000 years.  With eight PPM carbon dioxide in the air.

So carbon dioxide not a warming gas.  Every arctic winter carbon dioxide levels double back to a Jurassic one periods four PPM.  Just as be experienced the lowest natural temperatures on earth.

Down to -80° C above the Antarctic ice cap.  Where there is no photosynthesis to metabolise the carbon dioxide.  Then the spring comes and photosynthesis resumes in the seas and rock based land.

Back to the temperate two PPM carbon dioxide.  And a barmy temperature around 0° C.  So carbon dioxide rises in the cold.  Explain.