Best electric car

Flying out to the shops

https://jonsthings.blogspot.com/2020/08/best-electric-car.html

We do not use mains charging and a battery.  Like the Tesla car does!  That is 1930s technology.  I actually proposed the idea in my first two thermodynamic essay at university.  For which I got a B grade.

The problem is you have shifted there C02 production to the power station.  You are still using a diesel burn!  A nuclear power station is built using concrete.  Which makes nuclear power the fourth largest source of man made CO2.

Hybrid cars use a fossil fuel burn to generate electricity.  You double the efficiency of the diesel or electric engine, as I described in 1982.  The essay was long ago lost!  It is all technology and we can do better.

Ford and BMW were looking at a thermoelectric generator as an internal combustion replacement.  This only has a 13% efficiency.  But has no generous gothic effect.

A steam turbine has a 50% efficiency.  But you can't use it in a moving vehicle.  The thermoelectic effect turns heat directly into DC electricity.  You replace the need for a heavy an expensive storage batteries.

As a source of heat we use to 25x1cm steam plasma tube at four atmospheres.  Lightening demonstrates that heavy rain or snow sets up a lightening strike at eight atmospheres.  Collapses at three.  I know there are four atmospheres - which use every time or engineering estimate.

We fire up the plasma using the electronics from old fluorescent light.  And are four atmospheres it should self sustain!  This is easy to check out in a small garden laboratory.  A garden shed!

The steam plasma does a plasma burn from regular water.  The chest twice the dynamism of nuclear fusion.

1 H2O+P+PL→He+O+E2+X-ray

I really had hoped by now our the to the garage hobbyist would have got the system working.  And told me of any corrections an economic.

A 50x1cm steam plasma are four atmospheres should generate a constant 2.4 MW of heat.  A commercially sourced steam turbine will generate 1.2 MW of mains power.  Here we are static!  So they can use the greater efficiency turbine.

Any house needs 8 kW.  Will generate the carbon zero electricity for 150 houses.  We use by electronics to turn the DC into mains AC.  With the credit voltage and frequency,

This will yield an income from the National Power grid of two million UK pounds a year.  The UK he only needs 44 GW of power.  It sounds a lot!  40,000 plasma power plants.  To supply and the electricity for 66.8 million people.  Avoiding the need to burn fossil fuels.

Every nuclear power plant knees annual insurance cover of 100 billion.  There is no commercially available insurance above one billion.  So every nuclear power plant on earth is running massively criminally under insured.  And must instantly cease, and never restart.


My plasma power plant needs just 10-15cc of regular water a year.  Basically we start of a 5 cc of regular water.  And now a distant ancestors in 2000 years time, after worry about topping up the water level.

We burn no oil or gas.  The produce no CO2.

For the car we utilises a frighteningly tiny volume of water.  And generate an infinite range electric car.  That turns regular water into massive amounts of carbon zero power.

We stop as a service station had to eat!  Or call into a restaurant.  We need burn no oil or gas.

A Tesla power plant cost 3000 UK pounds.  My system can be built for under 400 pounds.  And utilises no external source of current.

At home we can hook up to the mains.  And soul and 75 kW of carbon zero power to the national grid.

So the car or van is basically fuelless.  And produces no carbon dioxide.  Either at the car engine, or at the remote power plant.

If we set up a plasma power plant as home we generate an annual income of six million UK pounds.  And provide the carbon zero power for 150 houses.

So only one that has ever to them and 50 the steam filled a plasma power plant.  To supply all the power requirements of the UK.  Professor Z was speechless last time I saw him.  And wanted to know where this idea it had come from!

Ford, BMW earth sciences and the Internet.  Terms there is quite in nimble company.  They can set up plasma tubes, with thermoelectic generators: which was illogical science published in the 1950s.

And have a bigger company!  Than battery or mains charging.  Though it is range electric cars.  My car has got infinite range.  Basically free mileage!

I have in publishing stuff about steam plasma do molecular nuclear fusion, for years!  And nobody has picked up on the fact that I got my calculations wrong!  A steam plasma does the ready constant 1 MW of carbon zero heat.  A little steam turbine and very dynamic suspension were cures ½ MW of electrical output.  500 kW of power.

An it looks like a thermoelectric generator will give us 130 kilowatts of electrical output.  This was seen to be enough even to run a small helicopter.  The sports car require in just 20 kW of electrical power.

All this science confirmed by the Ford Motor Company.  The firmer electric generator is less efficient, there is a semi conductor device high no generous gothic centring effect.

Hence he is ideal to drive vehicles and cars.  This knees practical confirmation.  At the very worst we are vertically mounted heating chamber, where the plasma centres pass the heat to the air.

And that hot air passes through are thermoelectic generator, to U.S. or nice zero carbon electrical output.  We have no frequent regular charging and so many years power outlets.  Where the power is directed to a power station.

A commercial power station releases carbon dioxide continuously.  Which within 5 minutes is converted by photosynthesis on land and sea, into plant biomass.  No climatic effect.

Nuclear power uses a fossil fuel burn on limestone to make alors cement, I utilised or produce their reinforced concrete.  The you in the two years so far plant construction nuclear power releases the Covent carbon dioxide, to running a commercially fired power plant for 25 years.

Nuclear power is so mankind's fourth largest source of carbon emissions.  Nuclear power publicise manmade global warming - in total indifference to send huge carbon emissions.

1995 and the climate entered a natural 28 year period of global cooling: cause five predictable solar emission cycles.  So in 1986, the year of the Chernobyl incident in the Ukraine, where winner.  A natural climatic warming.

As though all the planets in the inner solar system.  2023 and the climate snap back to warming.  Including all the planets in inner solar system.  Including MARs would 98% carbon dioxide in the air.

The temperate earth there is just a static0.0002% - a level capped by natural photosynthesis on land and sea.  Static for last 11.2 1000 years.

Nuclear power should really have taught to university biology departments, and that nature is carbon cycle.  Before investing 10,000,000 pounds a year, into the spurious manmade global warming climate change.

The static trace gas affects nothing!  Carbon dioxide just two parts per million, around the temperate afternoon air.

Above the arctic ice in winter there is four PPM carbon dioxide in the air.  And the lowest natural temperatures on earth.  Down to -80° C above the Antarctic ice pack.

So it seems that are steam plasma is over and tacit way he to drive a car.  My calculations indicate I say 15x1,5cm non pressurise steam plasma should release a constant 500 kW of electrical power.  A pressurised steam plasma at two atmospheres, will release a constant 1.8 megawatts.

Ideal to drive of Power System in a factory, who will make to our 40,000 UK pounds annually for the national grid, for although lovely carbon zero electrical power.

To drive an electric car or we want A15 CM steam plasma.  Which will generate a constant 65 kW of electrical output.  As DC Power.  We rectify into a speed linked AC current.

And drive contact MS Electric Motors on the wheel hubs.  The regular family car only needs 8 kW of electrical power.  Supplied today by the 1950s technology of fashion charging.  Which has a limited range and he is expensive technology.

18,000 UK pounds plasma and thermoelectic generator, costs just 2000 UK pounds.  Electrical by fus costing 3000 UK pounds.  And needing constant maintenance and regular replacement.

Are plasma will burn just two little water ever to measure.  We transfer the unused water to our next electrical car.  A quick blast of external electrical current, and we set up a steam plasma.

Which will run for the rest of the cars life.  Utilising two little water ever to measure.  No regular stops at a service station, other than to use at alors and eat food.

We can drive the car or and the helicopter between cities, landing on the city outskirts to the it into town in our sports car.  All totally carbon zero.

Week in utilised a static steam plasma as home, to get a constant 130 kW of carbon zero AC electricity.  Synchronise with the mains voltage and phase.  Totally carbon neutral.  Utilising no fossil fuel burn and or hyper toxic radioactive processes.

Using science published in the 1930s!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

heat and power that pays

carbon the most static gas

carbon free helicopter