Man made climate change always wrong
Man-made climate change SO wrong |
For 1986 to 1995, the paid stooges to nuclear power declare the carbon dioxide would cause manmade global warming. Total fiction.
Nuclear power bills its power plants using a fossil fuel burn on limestone, to drive of the carbon dioxide and leave cement. Roar their reinforced concrete! Making nuclear power mankind's fourth largest source the carbon emissions, when busy building power plants!
Since photosynthesis evolved and he cretaceous, the trace of carbon dioxide left in the temperate air has been controlled exclusively by photosynthesis.
During the day of on land and seas biology it turns carbon dioxide into the carbohydrates of life.
1 mCO₂+(n+r)H₂O+L→(Cā(H₂O)ā+O₂-E)+r(He+O+E²+Lb+X-ray)
There is no chemical source of helium. There's a light or X rays. And there is no source of radioactive decay! So we are doing molecular nuclear fusion. Down to 0° C around the earth!
Lot for the carbohydrate is linked with excretion of oxygen gas, and takes in energy. Every climate scientists on earth were understand the chemically equation, not one has said anything!
They are too busy banking the cheques for a nuclear power there to top biological rubbish. Professors of physics and engineering. Who neither understand nor have experience in biology is carbon cycle.
Every O scientist alive realises that plant's sucking carbon dioxide. At university we learn and enter the present limit of just two parts per million. The static level since before 1880 - and mankind's industrial revolution.
In the Jurassic photosynthesis was less evolved. And left four PPM carbon dioxide in the air. During the one periods sea levels were 60 metres lower! We had twice the carbon dioxide level.
There was 85% more active biological life. And term percent more oxygen in the air. There were three natural ice ages.
The carbon dioxide rose to eight PPM: at this juncture it is physically interesting and or climate change pundit has commented on there being four times more carbon dioxide in the air in the Jurassic ice age.
In the present epoch above the polar ice In winter, we are back to four PPM carbon dioxide. As be experienced the lowest natural temperatures on earth. Down to -80° C above the Antarctic ice In winter.
Air in the temperate earth in the afternoon sun, carbon dioxide levels are static at two PPM. Nuclear power has been trying to kick up a stink, about gas of life! No carbon dioxide and photosynthesis, no oxygen to breathe and no carbohydrates to eat.
And the carbohydrates have no climatic effect. Man's carbon dioxide never leaves the low earth's atmosphere. The weather is made in the stratosphere. There is a static 2.5 parts per million/m carbon dioxide in the air. Ejected there in prehistory by explosive volcanic eruptions.
Since you nurses are existed actresses share similar students that a static trace gas affects nothing! Carbon dioxide static at two PPM the temperate air since before 1880. Twice the level in the polar ice - at -80° C.
The carbon dioxide is a very obviously not a warming gas.
Since Chernobyl every nuclear power plant on earth has required annual insurance cover of 40 billion. All 422 nuclear plant's! Running with a criminal am insurance cover of only 50 million.
After Chernobyl 2010 and the choir insurance rose to 100 billion. So nuclear insurance is just 0.5% of the required number. The adequate insurance the United Nations has the legal imperative to shut down every nuclear power plant on earth.
Every quasar scientists who studied manmade global warming or climate change since 1986, has a masterly overpaid tax power of biological rubbish! They should be removed from education for ever.
Having to return or the wages paid to them since they first started spurting biological, nuclear funded fiction. These are nurse can attend for human beings in science medication ever.
A side issue is that we are adequate operating insurance, nuclear power was always prohibited from funding science, and specifically never allowed to fund the science chairs.
There is no legal argument! Yes SCC or take funding from criminal organizations.
Comments
Post a Comment