Increasing farm yields
Nature on Earth does nuclear fusion |
I was working and nuclear fusion at Sheffield University. And till my PH D work was mysteriously ended - as I found the answer! Which is carbon zero heat. I would generate carbon zero electricity via a small steam turbine.
The trouble I time to get my old academics supervisor to fire me up a little steam plasma. Without doubt one of the clearest people ever to the wall at the face of the planet. He told that the turbulent flow and of high pressure water did what we later called molecular nuclear fusion.
1 H₂O+TU→He⁺+O⁺+3e⁻+L+E²+X-ray TU= turbulence.
This is why geothermal or steam issuing from a steam vent, already does nuclear fusion on earth! As nature does 1.
A case study from the Tauhara geothermal system, Taupo ...
ResearchGate
https://www.researchgate.net › publication
Mapping lithology and hydrothermal alteration in geothermal systems using portable X-ray fluorescence (pXRF): A case study from the Tauhara geothermal ...
Professor Z would be so unsurprised, Bio emission of light and X rays from geothermal vents. In salford ideas some digging, and found the X-ray boils were the most dynamic natural nuclear fusion system on earth.
Every 3 minutes around the world he every rain or snow has done sufficient nuclear fusion, to set up a lightening strike.
2 H₂O+P+TU→He⁺+O⁺+3e⁻+L+E² TU= turbulence. So are back to 1 again. A constant level of nuclear fusion power by the precipitation in the free air. No radioactive isotopes involved! The helium 3 produced by the interaction of the X rays with the helium, reacts with nothing the by undergoes nuclear fission.
3 ³He⁺→2H⁺+e⁻+E so the helium and decays naturally into hydrogen ions and light. All the helium in the air, is the product of the nuclear fusion of hydrogen ions going on throughout nature.
The most dynamic variety years of lightning strike. Where we get the continues emission of light - not the light flash illumination produce buyer rain or snow storms. The nuclear fusion in the storms bills up A potential difference between the cloud tops, where the positive ions collected, and the ground where the negative charge falls.
At 5000 volts 100 amps we get a lightening down strike, to discharge all that electrical potential - setting up a steam plasma in the air. We then get the much more massive lightening up strike, as the lightening does massive carbon zero heat generation.
4 H₂O+P+PL+TU→He⁺+O⁺+3e⁻+L+E²+X-ray - back to 1 again. Which is how nature does nuclear fusion in the air, from the turbulent flow of high pressure water droplets.
Dr. Z was a card carrying genius. Who was purchased a chair of chemical engineer at Sheffield University, and then lost interest in nuclear fusion - the carbon zero Energy System so heavyily used by nature in the earth's air.
Geography has recorded that a 1.5kmx2cm steam plasma are this is a lightening involved, makes five tonnes of helium ions. Of issues no chemical source.
Eureka, a quick use of I Stein's E=mc² an we get at an energy release of 2.5x10³⁰W R. Energy. The professor was intrigued 2000, there I was interested in the relativistic musings of Albert Einstein. And got me a book on this subject!
Weeks killed this down to a 1m x1cm steam plasma, firing up the plasma using the high voltage electronics from a fluorescent light. I applied to the steam from a paint stripper. But my PH D got ended, before we could confirm the energy release of 2.4 MW of carbon zero heat.
The plasma burn so a heavy atomic elements, so we get twice the release of heat light and X rays. But no solid matter! No radioactive waste.
The turbulent flow of the deep sea currents already two molecular nuclear fusion in the whole currents around the world. When we bubble out helium and free radical oxygen gases. Again there is no chemical source of helium.
5 H₂O+P+TU→He+O+E²+X-ray The helium bonds with the X rays, so C so a continuous source of helium three. Which unfortunately decays too quickly to V useful energy source.
My American contact was interested in more work on a steam plasmas. And fire up A steam plasma in a glass cylinder. And got twice the energy release of molecular nuclear fusion.
6 (H₂O+P+TU) confined→2(E²+L+X-ray)
Professor Z should be teaching engineering students are steam plasma as being a carbon zero Energy System. We get off 1 MW of heat light and X rays.
If we drive a steam turbine we get off ½ MW of carbon zero power. Which is obviously the conclusion to my PH D was headed towards - before uranium nuclear power got it ended.
So our little 30cm steam plasma will produce a carbon zero heat and light to illuminate 1/4 of an acre. We can erect geordie easy downs above the arctic circle. To be heated an minute 247, every day the year using their own little steam plasmas.
Which consume 3x10⁻ⁱ⁵cc of regular water a year. They can have little spring loaded top up systems, and do matter where if it ever again!
So Yorkshire and lancashire can have a little creates a steam plasmas below flotation balloons, to replace the missing sun in winter. And as he into natural cellar radiation during the summer.
This will more than double the crop yields. Allying us to farm Siberia. Which will have significant heat and light all year. They will be twice as productive as Texas.
We fire up the plasmas using the high voltage electronics from old fluorescent light. And then allow the plasma to rises into the highly out naturally. Provided the three major sunlight all year for no cost. Making the UK farms twice as productive as Kent!
So heat and light for no cost. And the plant's will eat carbon dioxide. Down to the present limit of just two parts per million. The arctic for the carbon dioxide levels double to four PPM in the winter. Air temperature down to -80° C above the Antarctic ice cap.
In the little ice age of the 18th century, mineral records tolerance there was four PPM carbon dioxide in the European Air. Temperature down to -20° C. So carbon dioxide rises naturally in the cold!
As is no photosynthesis.
In the Jurassic there was four PPM carbon dioxide in the temperate air. And 85% more life on earth compared to today, in the warm periods. There were three natural ice ages.
When carbon dioxide rose to eight PPM. Sheffield has a world wide reputation for gas analysis form soil samples produce five drilling a core from the ground. Seeking to eight the little ice age, according to a lack of biological activity in the source ample.
So twice the carbon dioxide in the little ice age, it empty -20° C across Europe. All this is totally familiar to every rational scientist on earth.
The three Jurassic ice ages at eight PPM carbon dioxide, in the freezing air! Four times the present trace level of two PPM, around the temperate earth in the light.
Carbon dioxide does not make the weather. Never has done! Mankind's carbon dioxide does not rise to the stratosphere, where our weather is produce five predictable solar emission cycles.
So we just had to seven years of natural global cooling. Hence manmade climate change was nuclear cover, for a period of natural climatic cooling.
Eight PPM carbon dioxide in the air during a Jurassic ice age. When the polar ice An extended towards the equator.
In North America, glaciers spread from the Hudson Bay area, covering most of Canada and going as far south as Illinois and Missouri. Glaciers also existed in the Southern Hemisphere in Antarctica. At that time, glaciers covered about 30 percent of Earth's surface.
Natural ice ages are caused by a predictable solar emission cycles. Which teaches is that the next ICJ is over due. Back to another little ice age - like the 18th century.
Only now we can erect little geordie sick domes over the north pole. Heated an minute by the air the carbon zero steam plasma. Self powering once started. Acting as a little sun.
Sucking in all that lovely carbon dioxide - and falling plant biomass. Eating the carbon dioxide above the north pole, to the temperate limit of just two PPM. And releasing the heat, to melt the polar ice. Which will contract ID as a form liquid water.
Will want to spray air over the geordesic domes, to provide the farmers were natural source of water. We increase the natural food supplies of the world, to meet the challenges of the growing world population.
Human population around 8.05 billion people
The world population has grown rapidly, particularly over the past century: in 1900, there were fewer than 2 billion people on the planet. The world population is around 8.05 billion people in 2023.
Comments
Post a Comment