Cooling the hot countries
4x CO2 - brr!!! |
For the cold areas like Manchester in the UK, we want to create a little steam plasma cylinders, below flotation balloons. We fire up the plasma using high voltage electronics - like from old fluorescent light.
They burn just 3x10⁻ⁱ⁵cc of regular water a year to I had a constant 1 MW of heat plus association light and lower power X rays to local environment. Replacing missing sunlight.
1 H₂O+PL→2(E²+L+X-ray) The X rays are low power, and may not even penetrate the glass cylinder. Certainly nobody is worried about the X rays we get free natural sunlight.
To warm the air we can immerse an aluminium helix in the deep canal basins. Where we pressurise the low pressure gas, it gets mad hot: the Carnot heat pump! So take in heat down to just below 0° C and as we double the gas pressure this he had viral and other smaller aluminium helix, to the air at 240° C.
This is a good use of 1950s technology to heat at the environment around the open C, lakes are a canal system.
We are faced with the environment being too warm. So this time we have a large low pressure the aluminium helix, in the air. Sucking heat as the environment into a low pressure gas.
As we compress the gas we use a stainless steel helix in the seas. Below the depth at which ships pass. And we double the heat to the air to the seas and oceans of the world. Where the warm water flows back towards the poles, the dispiriting muscle heat to the cold countries, where the so the heat is very welcome.
So will melt the ice sheets. But ice floats. As it melts into liquid water, it actually contracts! Which is why the freezing radiators England to crack open - as the water freezes and expands.
We are improving the natural heat shuttle of the world. Weather so all the heat is carried from the equator in the warm sea currents, towards the poles.
But the arctic ice freezes the cold in the coal countries. If we have agreed of my steam plasma cylinders, we will warm and light the ice. The ice melts into cold water at just over 0° C. And carry as the arctic cold back into the air promotions.
Or in excess with the ambient seawater and at 3° C reaches a maximum density of water and flows back to the equator.
When it rises up as all sorts of other radiation. It is then pushed back towards the poles, by the cool water at 3° C.
So we health warmed the poles directly, which has melted the ice caos. Which there are free to carry the follow cold back to the equator. Were cool water is very very welcome!
So warming the poles acting as a cooling the equator! We make and more temperate world. Warm the high street north and south poles. No illuminated by our steam plasma centres. So watering massive by Brent UK Systems.
That suck Ian all the carbon dioxide they can get! Today in the arctic winters carbon dioxide levels double to four parts per million. Twice the temperate average of two PPM.
The Antarctic ice cap gets down to -80° C. We had twice the carbon dioxide! Which is so obviously not a warming gas. Its levels wax and wane according to plant growth cycles.
In the little ice age of the 18th century, Europe had intermittent snow covering. When snow covers the ground carbon dioxide levels double to to the arctic four PPM. The average European temperature was -20° C.
As the receded, the carbon dioxide fell to the temperate two PPM we have today. Who ever devised manmade global warming on behalf of nuclear power, forgot to factor in photosynthesis - the major life support system on earth.
The sulphur cycle supports life in volcanic poles - and he is far more acidic. The carbon cycle is more benign to life.
Now we are supporting plant growth throughout the years at the poles, 247 and 365.25 days a year.
They will suck Ian the carbon dioxide and turn into plant biomass. Which will increase the natural animal life on earth - plant and animals are in a dynamic balance.
2 mCO₂+(n+r)H₂O+L+chlorophyll→(Cₘ(H₂O)n+O₂-E)+r(He+O+E²+X-ray)
Less photosynthesis is a type of biological molecular nuclear fusion. The other end of life on earth is governed by the are availability of carbon dioxide. More carbon dioxide, more life on earth - not more carbon dioxide in the air.
Animals also do nuclear fusion as the eat plant biomass.
3 Cₘ(H₂O)n+O₂+ mitochondrial action→mCO₂+(n-r)H₂O+r(He+O+E²+X-ray)
The oxidation of carbohydrates by animals, but also does biological molecular nuclear fusion. Both chains of the sulphur cycle also are doing molecular nuclear fusion. So all life on earth they've rates X rays as it does nuclear fusion.
In the Jurassic there was four PPM carbon dioxide in the air during warm periods. When there was 85% more biological life on earth. Resulting the sea levels were 60 metres lower. So the temperate world in the Jurassic had a four the level of carbon dioxide.
More life and lower seas. No if we cite a grid a steam plasma is over and the dark lands in the polar winter, they will support vibrant ecosystem so all year and. Sucking in all that lovely carbon dioxide.
Our weather is made in the stratosphere. But mankind's additional carbon dioxide is a heavy gas and never rises that high. I wrote a paper saying there was 4.9 parts per million, carbon dioxide in the stratosphere - ejected there by natural explosive volcanic eruptions.
Mankind's extra carbon dioxide results in additional life on earth within 5 minutes. No possible weather effect! There a nation years the biggest cider science fiction I have ever heard!
It is not unlikely! It is totally scientifically impossible. The carbon dioxide is eaten by plants. That convert the fossil fuels back into active plant biomass within 5 minutes.
Extra plant life these inevitably to extra animal life. Remember carbon dioxide levels double in natural ice ages!
So the three natural Jurassic ice ages, had eight PPM carbon dioxide in the air. As displayed by the minerals and the there are phosphorus dated to that period in prehistory. Carbon dates are only good for 5000 years! And
So four times as much carbon dioxide in the temperate air. In the depths of prehistoric ice age. One of the most Life Power and times in earth history.
Comments
Post a Comment