Replacing fossil fuel burning

Heat from regular water

During my time on a PH D at Sheffield University 2000-, another student taught me that burning fossil fuels give out X rays and helium gas.  There is no chemical source of helium!

1 CH₄+3O₂+ spark→(CO₂-E)+(2-r)(He+O+L+X-ray-E²)

Where r(He+O+L+X-ray-E²) is molecular nuclear fusion!  So burning fossil fuels does nuclear fusion.  Involving no radioactive substances!  The steam plasma burning regular water into helium and oxygen gases, with visible light and X rays.  Of which there is no chemical source.

Actually oxidising the carbon takes in energy.  So we are doing nuclear fusion at atmospheric pressure and temperature.  Lightening does the system down to -50° C.

So really we would prefer our avoiding the carbon altogether!  Locally week in use a high voltage electronics from a fluorescent light, just a fire up the steam plasma.

2 H₂O+de/dT→(H₂O+L+X-ray-E²)

My American friend has confirmed that a 30x1.5cm steam plasma release a constant 1 MW of carbon zero heat.  Use to drive a steam turbine, we get out ½ MW of carbon zero electricity: we convert into mains linked AC current.

Allying the home user to fire up a steam plasma using the electronics from old fluorescent light, in a glass cylinder purges from local hardware shop, getting the steam from a paint stripper or boiling pan.

And then we get 1 MW of carbon zero electricity.  So we get a check for six million UK pounds.  More money than the average working man earns in a lifetime!

If we are running a 100 MW power station, we need 24 1m x2cm the steam plasma is at four atmospheres.  Which we utilise 3.6x19ⁱ⁴cc of regular water a year.  Burn the water into heat light and X rays.

Not featuring a boiler room or carbon emissions!  Totally emission free, and almost cost free electricity.  Featuring no oil or gas burn!  Potentially too little water ever to measure in a lifetime!

Lightening does molecular nuclear fusion.  Half as dynamic as A steam plasma burn.

3 H₂O+P+TU→He²⁺+O⁺+3e⁻ with with greetings to the physicists at MIT.  Who liked my chemical equations!  Which are tending to be more and more physics!

We can convert an oil or gas station, simply into molecular nuclear fusion plant.  By firing up a steam plasma cylinders, to replace the gas and oil burners on the annual shutdown.

Physics can use the confirm the energy release from a steam plasma, in a week!  He really is very basic engineering.

So the carbon dioxide to biology and the carbon cycle.  Photosynthesis pegs carbon dioxide around the temperate earth, at just two parts per million.

Which explains why biology reacts in horror, at physicist talking about manmade global warming.  Carbon has been static throughout the modern epoch.  Since before mankind even evolved!

Manmade global warming was devised by nuclear power after Chernobyl in 1986.  Two just over a continuing hyper toxic existence!  Tragically they did not talk to biology is there any possibility of a carbon dioxide increase.

Carbon dioxide does increase naturally every year in the arctic winter.  To four PPM.  Air temperature -50° C!  Hence biology as he lied C and feeble talk about manmade climate change.

It was just so wrong!  Trying to cover the fact that the earth cooled from 1995.  Backed a warming next year.  It is a natural 28 year cycle warming and cooling, cause five predictable solar emission cycles.

Which is why all the planets in inner solar system have been cooling since 1995.  Including mass with 98% carbon dioxide in the air.  And no photosynthesis on the ground!

By nurses closer to the sun so warmer than the earth.  But he also has been cooling since 1995.  The global warming people are funded by nuclear power.  And no knowledge of biology or the weather.  They are serious fiction agents!  And biological idiots.

Nuclear power is a major external funder of science higher education.  Which explains why academics have talked scientific rubbish since 1986.  The climate is the son!  We leave we've whatever the sun gives us.

But now we can fire up the steam plasma tubes, and replaced or oil and gas burning.  Making carbon zero non nuclear power.  80 times as dynamic as hyper toxic uranium nuclear fission.

Burning fossil fuels only releases 250 kW/m.  Molecular nuclear fusion 2.4 MW at four atmospheres.

I wrote a paper on this 2001.  Am I PH D work was yanked from under my feet!  May be complicated by my accountant not paying out the money for my studies.

My call case for my near fatal car accident was not settled!  An almost did not really 1 minute to be seen to be doing a PH D at the 10th best university in England.

I have kept Sheffield at a date on my research.  Dr. Z was fought a chair of chemical and process engineering by uranium nuclear power, and lost interest in nuclear fusion!

Having suggested the turbulent flow of high pressure water or steam did molecular nuclear fusion.  The most brilliant scientific insight I have ever heard!