Replacing gas and oil burning

Fossil fuel burning does nuclear fusion

The equations for gas and oil or very similar, though diesel oil is carbon 12, and petrol is carbon 16.  Gas is CH₄.  So I'll give you equations for gas - simpler.

As you burn the fossil fuels you do oxidise the carbon.  And has some of the hydrogen into water.  But some of the hydrogen does molecular nuclear fusion.  The nuclear fusion releases massive energy - oxidise the carbon takes in energy.

1 CH₄+(2+r)O₂+flame→(CO₂+2H₂O-E)+r(He+O+L+X-ray+E²) which is why a flame of oil or gas gives out X rays and light!  Of which there is no chemical source.  The net energy releases just 45 kW/m of burners.

If we play at the flame on to titanium metal, we can double used to 98 kW/m.  So we titanium plate the inside surfaces of the engine, or boilerplate.  And be halve our fuel burn for the same energy production.  Halving our carbon dioxide!

But as I keep reiterating, photosynthesis around the temperate land and earth converts come dioxide into active plant biomass within 5 minutes.  Sucking the gas from the air!  There is no climate affect of carbon dioxide.  That is stupid nuclear fiction!

Ironically enough nuclear power bills its plants using loads and loads of reinforced concrete.  By the summer produced via a fossil fuel burn on limestone.  Making an active nuclear power plant building programme the fourth largest source of man made carbon dioxide.  So nuclear power is so not carbon zero!  Come on carbon audit yourself.

So the energy production system is the steam plasma.  Which does molecular nuclear fusion.  Turning regular water into helium and oxygen gases, with massive heat and lower power light and X rays.  So really we might occur carbon out of the energy equation.

And we can do!  The use high voltage electricity to fire up the steam plasma, we've had the carbon.  I calculated that he was self sustain at four atmospheres.  My American friend fired up a steam plasma without pressure.  So we use his practically confirmed date are.

2 H₂O+P+V+PL→He+O+L+E²+X-ray.  Eureka!  High voltage electricity turns water into helium and oxygen gases.  We apply eight and X rays plus massive heat.  And a karaoke ladies at four atmospheres will get 8.6 MW of heat from a one metre applied 2 cm steam plasma.

Brett firm that a 30x1cm steam plasma liberated a constant 1 MW of heat.  Ideal for home use!  We can generate 500 kW of carbon zero electricity.  From a commercially sourced little steam turbine.

So we have no fossil fuel burn and no radioactive materials handling.  We are doing A plasma burn.  That is what PL means.  We smash the water molecules into positive ions and electrons.

Then the hydrogen ions bond with a free electron, to form a neutron.  And the neutrons bond with the oxygen to cause repeated nuclear fission, and till we are left with hydrogen ions and free electrons.

The hydrogen ions bond with two neutrons, and fission into massive energy of light and lower power X rays.

3 H⁺+e⁻ +2n⁰→(E²+L+X-ray)

Every lightening strike around the world does molecular nuclear fusion.  Which is why lightning produces helium and oxygen gases, spirts set so many neutrons, while freezing heat light and X rays.

So of five tonnes of helium ions from every lightening strike, teaches us of lightning produces 1.2 MW/m of heat.

And we know that lightening is half as dynamic as a plasma burn.  As half the heat is a sort power production of helium and oxygen ions.  So a steam plasma to produce 2.4MW from 40x1cm plasma in a glass cylinder.

So Brett's 1 MW form and pressurise plasma, is exactly right!  If you extrapolate to a 1m x 2cm steam plasma at four atmospheres, the you get at 8.6 MW of heat.  Compare and contrast with just 45 kW/m for gas or oil burners.  The plasma is so much better.

And we do not produce any solid waste gas or radioactive compounds.  Which is get heat light and lower power X rays.  Totally carbon zero!  And 1,924 times as dynamic as burning oil or gas.

So we utilised no radioactive compounds.  The plasma enriches and fissions its own hydrogen isotopes.  So you get clean, safe, free and carbon zero power.

And he would not dependent on burning over priced oil and gas.  And certainly not on any radioactive materials.

Present nuclear power is so toxic that he requires annual insurance cover of 100 billion.  And somewhere around the world a nuclear power plant will experience a triple core meltdown every 25 years.

The next nuclear incident will be in France!  Which has 200 nuclear power stations: but now it is building power stations in Belgium!  As the French don't want them.

And France has the worst engineers in the world.  Why does the world let EDF, the French nuclear firm, build the most dangerous and toxic engineering plants in the world.

America are also has 200 nuclear plants.  It experienced 3 Mile Island most recently.

In contrast an individual can construct a 30x1.5cm steam plasma, and get at a clean and safe for megawatts of heat.  500 kW of electrical power!  The electricity requirements for 60 houses.

All totally carbon zero.  And every commercial power plant can convert over to a steam plasma cylinders, and year totally carbon neutral.  There free using 1000 times more energy is probably overkill.

Are then it is or ever go to professor Z for you some awful lot so on the turbulent flow of water doing molecular nuclear fusion, an ideal he would prefer our to disown.

The CNS present nuclear power bought him a chair of chemical and process engineering.  Money shouts.  Me?  I always preferred truth.