A steam plasma better than oil burning

better than burning fossil fuels

In the U.S., the average household that uses oil for heat uses about 500 gallons between October and March (182 days). If you divide the average amount of fuel used (500 gallons) by the number of days (182), the average home uses about 2.75 gallons of oil each day.

How much is oil per gallon?

The average price of heating oil in the United States in the winter of 2021/22 is expected to reach 3.39 U.S. dollars per gallon.19 Oct 2021

How much does oil make a year?

In 2020, the total revenue of the United States' oil and gas industry came to about 110.7 billion U.S. dollars, a decrease from the previous year due to the coronavirus pandemic impacts in the industry.13 Oct 2021


So we are looking at around $2000 a year globally!  A big proportion of household income.  And the or burner only they've rates 45 kW/m from the burners!  A single 50x1cm with steam plasma at four atmospheres generates 2.4 MW of heat.  Enough to heat 150 houses!

From 10⁻ⁱ²cc of regular water a year.  No expensive fossil fuel burn and!  No carbon dioxide generation.  Just a clean and nontoxic burn from steam.

1 (H₂O+P+PL)enclosed →2(E²+L+X-ray)

So we basically need never top up the 5 cc water boiler, in 1000 generations!  We priest massive clean heat.

We fire up the plasma using the electronics from old fluorescent light, are four atmospheres the plasma will self sustain.  We had twice the heat generation of from a lightening strike!  Which does less dynamic molecular nuclear fusion.

Generating five tonnes of helium ions every year.

2 H₂O+P+PL→He+O+L+X-ray 5 tonnes of helium ions annually, by merging to a hydrogen ions.  An energy release off 1.2MW/m from the plasma.

And there is a lightening strike every 3 minutes around the year throughout the year.  Providing nature with 10⁴⁰W our carbon neutral heat.  Direct sunlight only gives the earth 10 and⁶⁰W of heat annually.

Which use it generated by the hydrogen plasma, around our radient sun!  Why he has physics never talked about this massive carbon neutral Energy System.

So we a fire up the plasma up with in a glass centre, and get massive carbon neutral heat.  With no fossil fuel burn and involving no radioactive processes - the merging of two hydrogen ions into one helium and iron, is not radioactive - it is clean and safe nuclear fusion.

So we can replace every fossil fuel playing in the world!  With the infinitely safer and fantastically cheap or steam plasmas.  The clean Energy System of the future.

Uranium nuclear fission rods, only releases to them and 50 kW/m.  And produce a massively toxic plutonium, which nuclear plant spray over the local continent every 25 years.  Remember Chernobyl, and Fukushima.  After which Japan and Germany both band uranium nuclear power.

Nuclear power invested massively in science higher education, trying to build the themselves an economic future!  But they are toxic nuclear death.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

heat and power that pays

Image
Plants do nuclear fusion Totally carbon zero!  And he actually pays a small fortune.  They can easily years A steam plasma to generate all the heat and power a house requires, generating a massive cheque from the national grid. Right around the world right now somewhere there is a heavy rain or snow storms!  That does physical molecular nuclear fusion. 1 H₂O+P+TU→He²⁺+O⁺+3e⁻ So nuclear fusion in the open air, requiring are producing no radioactive waste!  Generating charged ions, free electrons and heat. The positive charge collects above the clouds layer.  The negative charge falls with electrons to the ground.  So heavy storms acts as a giant natural battery! When we burn up a potential difference of 500 volts, a steam plasma links up the charge or areas, to discharge 100 amps of electrical current. But once set up the free steam plasma does massive amounts of nuclear fusion. 2 H₂O+PL→He²⁺+O⁺+3e⁻+E²+X-ray Thanks to the physicists who have published this basic high s
Read more

carbon free helicopter

Image
Nuclear power has invented the idea that electricity is carbon free.  If the electricity is generated using hydro electric or wind power, nearly. If it generated using a fossil fuel burn and or nuclear power very much not!  Fossil fuel burning obviously releases carbon dioxide, as the flame fires up a steam plasma, but oxidising the carbon takes in most of the energy. During uranium nuclear power plant construction, the use a fossil fuel burn on limestone and to produce the cement require for their reinforced concrete. And nowhere you would wish to work in a nuclear plant where the cement was produced via uranium fission rods on limestone.  Which would produce radioactive concrete! This means that uranium nuclear power produces equal and carbon emissions of operating income plant for 25 years, in just two years!  Nuclear power very much not carbon zero. The transport house and feed the staff!  All carbon sources.  And electric cars are so not carbon zero! The answer was ac
Read more

High school biology teaches plants eat CO₂

Image
Biology loves CO 2 Plant's eat carbon dioxide from the air down to the present limit of two parts per million.  They build the carbohydrates of life and excrete oxygen.  A process that takes heat! At the same time the emits a faint blue light and X rays, as the plant photo blast actually does biological molecular nuclear fusion: turning regular water into helium and oxygen gases, the fate blue light and lower power X rays.  So all life on earth is supported by nuclear fusion on earth. 1 mCO₂+(n+r)H₂O+L+ chlorophyll→(Cₘ(H₂O)ₙ+O₂-E)+r(He+O+E²+Lb+X-ray) So all day in the light green plants' are actually doing biological molecular nuclear fusion.  Which is rather unexpected! The production of the carbohydrate for the carbon dioxide, takes in energy!  And excrete oxygen.  Cₘ(H₂O)ₙ be in the chemical formula are four carbohydrates - water back around a string of carbon atoms.  The basis for life on earth! At the same time and the skill volume of regular water he's tur
Read more