(carbon) Free heat and power

carbon free heat and power here

I went they said they Sheffield University 2001: after surviving near fatal car accident in 1988.  Sheffield should have looked after me!  Mysteriously my PH D work got ended, with gold!  After I heard nuclear power so you are very unhappy with my work.

Every 3 minutes around the world there is a lightening strike.  Where we have a heavy rain or snow in turbulent flow in a storm, doing nuclear fusion.

1 H₂O+P+TU→He²⁺+O⁺+E²+X-ray

I overheard the visitor from nuclear power, say my studies must be ended!  The next week mysteriously they were.  I had just tol professor Z how nature does nuclear fusion on earth.  At -50° C!

Lightening boats rain eighties and predictable.  So we set up a steam plasma in a 50x1cm glass cylinder, at four atmospheres.  And we get of a constant 2.4 MW of carbon neutral heat.

From just 10⁻ⁱ⁵cc of regular water a year.  We have a little spring loaded 5cc water reservoir.  And the both will have been swallowed by the sun before the reservoir near stopping up.

This is a total replace some or all fossil fuel burning!  No fossil fuel burning does do nuclear fusion.

2 CₘHₙ+pO₂+spark→mCO₂+(n-r)H₂O+r(He²⁺+O⁺+3e⁻+E₂)

So we note that burning oil or gas, it fires up a steam plasma - which does molecular nuclear fusion.  If we titanium plate the boilerplate or engine we double the heat produced by burning fuel.

Halving Oil Gas consumption has such a drastic effect on oil and gas prices.  And we half the carbon dioxide output.  Which the carbon reduction protocols always aspired to do.  And don't.

Plans take in carbon dioxide within 5 minutes, and convert into plant biomass.  Resulting the carbon dioxide level around the temperate earth there has been static at just two parts per million, during the present epoch.

Over the arctic ice In winter, at -50° C, we have double the carbon dioxide levels.  At four parts per million.  Carbon dioxide is so obviously not a warming gas!  Its levels are just two other to have any effect on anything.  Other than supporting all biological life on earth.

If we borrow the electronics from old fluorescent light, are plasma will release a constant 2.4 MW of carbon neutral heat.  Once started the plasma will self sustain.  Lightening blinks on at eight atmospheres, collapses at three.

So a steam plasma is a continuous carbon neutral heat source.  Involving no fossil fuel burning.  And definitely no radioactive materials.

Week in use the 2.4 MW of heat, to drive a commercially sourced steam turbine.  To freeze 1.2 MW of carbon neutral electricity.  Suddenly or power is free and nontoxic!

We can sell our excess current to the national grid, and get an annual check for six million UK pounds.  We ceased to buy electricity or gas!  We burn nothing.  So I told Sheffield all this in 2008: my PH D supervisor had told me as as ejected from Sheffield for no reason, to continue working on nuclear fusion.

And I was busy writing songs and sing on stage, so I have free time!  He could walled will the my equations, where I had not balanced my oxygen.  Then he has said nothing!

And wishes to take no credit for its work on nuclear fusion on earth: the turbulent flow of high pressure water or steam, convert summer steam into helium and oxygen gases.  Plus massive heat and X rays.

That is wise water rounds of bend, he can produce knocking!  As the pressure waves form helium and oxygen gas plus heat.  Some the which fossil me in the 1980s!

So a steam plasma years the carbon neutral energy source of the future.  Involving no fossil fuel burning.  Effectively free!  As are used so little water, we never need tol for the system.

We can extend this idea, to cite steam plasma cylinders at pinch points in the arctic ice.  Where the ists extends over the water during winter.  Now we can melt the ice.  The war water lapping on the snow and ice will melt it.

So increasing the flow of coal water back to the arctic.  So why warming the arctic seas, we release the I's a score water to flow back to the equator to call the hot lands.

The global climate has been cooling since 1995: hence the shift from global warming to manmade climate change.  Which sunlight is treated as if it was the same thing!

Climate change since to suggest there'll be more global rain.  But it is a more fresh water around the world!  Plants will love it.  So carbon dioxide has moved from being the indisputable cause of global warming, to the incident or passenger in a cooling world.

Plant growth has capped free carbon dioxide around the temperate earth, I just two parts per million.  A static trace gas affects nothing!

In the arctic winter we have four PPM carbon dioxide.  Air temperature-50° C.  More heat flowing into the seas, causes more evaporation and a wetter world!  We are increasing plant life on earth.

If he has set out to do this we could not done!  The sole control by a predictable solar emission cycles.  Carbon dioxide is static.  Scientists talking about manmade global warming climate change, has missed their Mental Health medication!

During the economic downturn and caused by the spurious Covid locked down, carbon dioxide levels have crashed.  Which is generated not one academic paper!  Interesting.  Carbon dioxide output has fallen by more than 50%.

Is so some of the carbon reductions money all mankind's the spurious and ravish carbon treated.  And now mankind can use a steam plasma.  Which is carbon neutral heat and power.

The climate change brigade are still talking about carbon!  Not one word about the advent or nuclear fusion on earth.  However my PH D supervisor, has also said not one word.  I gave him nuclear fusion on earth.  He used the total science.

No doubt he still frantically researching carbon emissions.  But biology it turns the carbon emissions into active biomass within 5 minutes.  The trace of carbon dioxide is static just 2 PPM.  A static trace gas affects nothing.

So we no longer need to burn or oil and gas.  Who are frantically trying to raise their prices!  Then nobody wishes to buy their fuels anymore.