Correcting carbon dates
![]() |
Half lives are subjective |
Carbon archaeology dates are wrong. Carbon has 1/2 life of a 5000 years. With ⁴⁴Mn having a whole five of 4400 years. These are flies are four background radiation levels.
When we have flying high pressure water, we get molecular nuclear fusion going on.
1 H₂O+TU+P→He+O+E+X-ray
This is the source of the helium and free oxygen gases produced by the deep sea currents.
So the highly pressure turbulent flow of water produces X rays. And he is proportionately decrease the helf lives of isotopes around. But crucially all half lives are reduced by the same proportion.
So intake a simple, and get the Carbon and manganese dates. Which will be slightly different. But for the states will be reduced according to local radiation level.
So we can scale the dates to give the right proportion of those elements in the material. Will know from chemically examination what proportion ozone is actually are.
So we can correct the dates so they are in the right proportion. So if the carbon dates desert 6000 years, and the manganese date only 4000, we can scale the estate's to give the right to chemical balance.
We can normalised the radioactive dating of materials. The local xray production will reduce both first half lives by the same amount. And we know what proportion are those are the that is in the material.
So we can secure the radioactive date, to reflect the are more plants we see in the material today.
It was the X rays have the same affect on the half life of each element. So the proportion of the elements, allows is to correct for the radioactive a sign of the environment.
So if the X ray emission reduces the carbon date by a factor two, it will also reduce the manganese half life by a factor of two.
We can slide down a proportional indicator, until it reflects the present and balance. So can prevent Christie carbon dates being accepted! They can also normalise for the potassium xray exposure. Though the potassium dates are a 1000 times less accurate!
carbon dates must be normalised
ReplyDelete